1: 100% burn, at the time of the fork. It was heavily implied originally, then as we all rallied behind the idea; burning that bloody ninjamine suddenly fell off the agenda. Burning it now would be great, but wouldn't make the same statement.
I've heard the 'let the community decide' argument, and I don't buy it. If you're forking, you choose how it looks, and you let people decide if they want to participate.
2: Enough fiddling. Launch SMTs as the next priority, and everyone can run simultaneous experiments in all sorts of governance, distribution and curation models.
It was in late testing when Justin arrived on Valentine's Day.
I agree - it would have been a huge statement and taken away all of the commandeering complaints. The HDF is still getting funded by the inflation, isn't it?
Supposedly. Seems the code was lost to the annals of time.
If top 20 witness rewards are insufficient to fund development, then the price is too low to support selling to fund development.