You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The soul-sucking world of shitposting

in OCD4 years ago

The activity was of low quality and the atmosphere was quite stale. Plenty of reruns. Toxic politics. I lost count of how many times I was told something like, "Go back to where you belong," if I left a comment. No place for me. Now it's paid votes again and those only make me angry, so they can have it, and shove it up their asses. I had to stay true to my word though. I said I'd leave once I saw censorship. Could have earned maybe $1000 in that time but what I believe in is more valuable to me I guess.

This has been the downfall of pretty much any "name" that has arrived from other places - they fail to build, expecting algorithms to find them because, "Don't you know who I am?"

LOL... unfortunately, yes, so true. Starstruck curators with high value votes hand them the big bucks, they take it, eventually run. Every damn time. If people didn't bend over backwards for them, they'd simply say the platform is broken and useless. Not one, over the span of many years, was ever able to do some simple math, then convert those numbers into encouraging thousands of their following to stake tokens instead of donating, and vote, daily. I don't want to talk about that though. Right now the push is to focus on onboarding new content creators by the thousands rather than consumers by the thousands, so this is the part where I retreat to the shadows and watch.

Sort:  

The activity was of low quality and the atmosphere was quite stale.

For the most part yes, but for me as a creator, nothing much changed - as a consumer, it did.

Now it's paid votes again and those only make me angry, so they can have it, and shove it up their asses.

At least in the past, people complained on those posts, now there isn't even a comment. =D

Could have earned maybe $1000 in that time but what I believe in is more valuable to me I guess.

I probably got somwhere around that, as did the curators who voted - they are nearly all on Hive from what I have seen. If they are going to vote anyway, they might as well vote to support Hive.

Right now the push is to focus on onboarding new content creators by the thousands rather than consumers by the thousands, so this is the part where I retreat to the shadows and watch.

I think most believe it is the logical order of things - but that is not how most sites start. people start consuming before the "real" creators come in, as they need an audience before it is worthwhile.

We were talking about fastfood places today, in the city I lived, there were 7 McDonald's (at the time) and there was no possibility for more franchises to open. There were 105-110 thousand people in the city, and they need at least 15,000 per location on average before they will grant another in that region of Australia.