Thanks for comment. In itself I do not have many long publications. Also if they are short, they are labeled as junk content or you fall into making a gathering of third-party content, more than constructive. As for the materials, most are analyzes, conclusions or observations on which I reflect. To prove if the publications are mine, I do not know what instrument or verification resource you mean.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Further checked your post history, and you are right, you do a mixture of everything. Am sorry I was a bit blunt in my previous comment. And yea, its quite difificult to proof your content (posts) are yours. You know what, since you commented they way you did, tells me you are sincere. Most to all abusers wouldn't respond, and when they respond they take a whole different attitude. Therefore I'm glad you didn't take my previous comment the hard way 🙃
Btw, some may consider short form posts 'junk' posts or whatever, but I don't. Value can be giving in many ways, long form, short form, through other content types than text and so on. In my curation rounds (using my vote train) am looking for the personal touch and undervalued content.
Wish a some great days ahead of you.