Overall I think you make a lot of good points. However, I think you could make your warning much less verbose. I don't think you need to go into detail and discuss, or try to, every possible way people could be offended. I do actually believe that is a mistake, just like I believe the Bill of Rights was exactly the same mistake, because making an attempt to list important rights inevitably leaves some out, and all rights are essential.
I don't think you can prevent some people from taking offense, no matter what you say, and I think you will give some people grounds for taking offense if you make such a list and leave out whatever offends them.
"We have factions and situations where a role may be male dominated and even some where they may be female dominated. We try not to get caught up in whether we give equal representation to males and females. We may put a little effort into providing such opportunities if it makes sense to our setting and we have the time to create the systems and additional art assets to make that happen."
This language specifically implies you have made most of your game male dominated, and that you didn't devote all of your time and effort to perfectly balance sexual domination. I promise that will offend someone. Just that, your disclaimer, not the balance itself, will offend someone. I'd leave that part out.
In fact, I'd try very hard to not mention any specific offensive things at all, for that very reason, but to simply say the real world reveals examples of many offensive things that contribute to the game by giving good guys things to oppose.
Thanks!
Edit: upon reflection, and re-reading, I'd leave out the following bit too:
"In our company we don’t get offended by games. In fact, when we choose to be offended (for make no mistake it is a choice) we stop to think how important that thing is to our life and we react appropriately. If the thing that offended us is a word we will likely shrug it off and may make a mental note that we don’t want to associate with a person. That’s it. We won’t demand our politicians, celebrities, and mob of friends attack anyone for a word.
"However, some of our fictional characters might actually just do that. That is exactly the type of action we think a bad guy might embrace."
You're almost begging to offend some people with that. I think you're trying to persuade and providing specific examples in that effort you find compelling. I think instead you need to realize that you can't persuade some people, and some people are going to be offended just because you exist. Really.
So, you should try to be as vague and general as possible, and not accuse people of being accusatory, but just tell them not to be offended, and if they can't avoid being offended, they should not play your game.
Haha. I'd agree with you if one thing were true.
That I actually care if they are offended or not.