Women kill their young children FAR MORE than men. So much so that there is a specific word for it. And men who kill babies are tried as murderers, and mothers are given counselling for the traumatic loss.
The problem is that there is no proper punishment for Clancy's. She is sick and probably uncureable, but they will probably be just fine outside of "stressful mother" conditions. In other words, sterilization, and keep her away from babies, or small children. But, that would be seen as cruel punishment.
The problem is that wimminz do not want to be held accountable. Not accountable for 3rd trimester abortion. Not accountable for 33rd trimester abortion. And how dare those moralists force their morals upon us.
But, morals are what allow us to have a high trust society. If a small group does not have morals, we need to lock them away from society and/or have the society shame them.
What i hear being argued is, "How dare society shame someone for lacking morals." And Wimminz are jumping on the bandwagon, because they do not want to be shamed if they "accidentally" find themselves in the same position.
The sex difference in parental child homicide depends heavily on the child's age and the circumstances of the killing. Mothers and fathers are roughly equal for infants, while men account for more filicide overall and substantially more killings of older children and family annihilation.
That said... it hardly matters to me. If its about justice, these people have to be dealt with. Institutionalized, imprisoned, whatever it takes. Its obvious they can't be part the civilized world.