Dear @littlebee4. You might not be aware yet, but we have made modifications to our community rules, particularly rule no. 3. Please take note of the post requirements below for your future publications. We are grateful for your attention.
3 - Content structure with a mix of A) Data of featured architecture or design such as Architect or Designer of work, name, location, history, style, technical details, etc. and B) Author's observations, analyses, reflections, critiques, and experiences of featured architecture or design is desired unless posts are written as educational tutorials or creative narratives, essays, or articles due to unavailability or lack of information.
Moreover, data, information, and facts stated in your publications must not contain written texts that are literally copied, retold, spun, recycled, repurposed, or translated directly from different sources such as physical books or Internet sites like Wikipedia and other similar references. Instead, we absolutely prefer original compositions of words published by our community authors.
We have also included this important reminder in our latest edition of Architecture Brew.
We highly encourage you to remove/delete the copy-pasted texts in your publication from the Wikipedia website and other online sources and rewrite the particular content using your own composition of words. We apologize for the inconvenience. Thank you for your patience and understanding.
Thank you dear @aplusd for the information, I wasn’t aware of the change indeed.
I understand the change of rule and what is required.
I did reword and change most of the text I quoted and stated that, it isn’t a copy and paste as stated. Do you still want me to remove it? Or is next time ok?
I will remember the new rules.
Have a wonderful Thursday 👋🏻😁
Okay, we understand. Now that you are aware of our modified community rules, we hope to see these new content standards reflected in your future publications.
On the other hand, kindly proceed and remove/delete the rewritten (spun) texts from Wikipedia and others in this post, and appreciate you rewriting them using your own original style in the next few hours. Thank you for your cooperation. 😀
Just one question on a confusion.
If I add dates, names of architects, builders etc. like specific data from the building… I do need to source them. I don’t want any problems when I remove the source. As some things can’t be written in own words they need to come from somewhere.
How can I not include other websites for this?
Indeed, all the necessary information like the Architect or Designer of work, name, location, history, style, technical details, etc. of the featured architecture are required to be stated/indicated in your post. And yes, you can include the sources of your data, and these online links are usually placed at the end of publications as "notes" or "references" like some typical articles, as long as you use your original word compositions. Hope that helps.
Ok, understand.
I just changed everything and it is in my own words now. 😉
Will keep it in mind for further publications. Thank you so much for the further information.
Have a wonderful day further!
Great! We are glad that you have understood our explanations. Thank you very much for your compliance. All the best dear @littlebee4. 😀
You are welcome, happy too. 😎
All the best!