Impressive! While I don't read the number of posts I used to, this one (reblogged by @shanibeer) stood out and I was not disappointed.
Here is my readability graph:
Not too surprising really. Right, wrong, or indifferent, at least anyone who has "met" me would find that I am consistent.
What was surprising?
"Counter" to "conventional wisdom" here on Hive, my higher word count, "University" level posts were the ones generating the greatest response. 👍 The engagement with whatever I chose to write was always my greatest motivator.
A couple of "continuous improvement" suggestions, for your consideration:
- Addition of the ubiquitous ? symbol on your graphs, whereby one can see whatever you chose to put in there to further enlighten your users. For example, clicking on a ? to see more precisely how the reading levels are defined.
- "Nesting" the info on (a picture is worth a 1,000 words ...) two or more graphs, into one. For example, tying into what I have just written and illustrated above - inside each readability level pie slice, break it down further, by embedding the # of responses to it. <=> Add that info into another column on the table below ...
Very nice work on this tool, @holoz0r. I hope you are amply rewarded for the clear effort you have put into it! 🫡
Remarkable consistency! I try to write across a variety of styles and formats myself - and I do enjoy writing technical, flowery prose sometimes, but my "natural voice" probably leans toward the more complex.
I like the "counter" and "unconventional" wisdom revealed here - hopefully curators will be able to use this as a tool to improve their decision making.