Its funny. Kind of. Maybe even. walay mahay.

I find it funny that guys use the phrase "char" when talking especially when it's a very feminine phrase.

Dafuq is up with that?

Hindi ko alam kung alam nila na nakita sila sa babae nga hindi sila lalake. Baka gusto lang silang mag pukboi lang.

Tanawon kung naabay mo basa ani unya maka hibaw kung mo lain na ni kay kung segi nakong basa sa mga suwat murag maayo ma wa og laway.

I mean of course speaking to someone with a lot of clout with me they have pointed out that this only commonly occurs online when they are chatting up chicks.

Don't hate the player, hate the game?

Yes, I can never hate the game since I was heavily invested in it growing up and probably would use the strategy employed by fuck bois. But then again I have not and probably never will get into a situation where I am getting hot and heavy online. The look on their faces are far better reward than just staring at the screen.

There is a certain allure to looking at the eyes. Seeing them unconsciously lick their lips. Hypnotizing them with word play. Or better yet play the touch/number game.

Walking into a crowded room. Eyes scanning. Catching those glimpses. Timing their breath. Observing the rose colour appear in their skin. Watching the brief hair flicker. Eye contacts turning into staring at their soul.

Games like that are far more exciting. There is a certain amount of brief patience when you ply your skill into the game as opposed to doing it on the screen.

I admit there is tension there but... can you not see how that will just lead to play... as you are probably being lead to nowhere.

Damin ng tao nag tingin sayo at may dami pang nakita nga nag lalaro ka, hindi yan conducive to anything other than mag screenshot sa DM mo para tawaan ka.

Tadi, ayaw na ana, mas maayo pa kung mag dowa ka ayaw og gamit og 'charr' unless gusto ka mag pakita nga bayot diay.

Ayaw up kasoko sa nag dowa, ga suko ka sa dowa.

Then again I could just be all wrong and this post was just a waste of space.

Prove me wrong?

Source