Hi. The post contains 1 sentence and a link. Nothing else. So it would be rather fitting for a microblogging option.
For dyslexia, I would suggest trying a basic, free Grammarly add-on for a browser. It will highlight errors and suggest corrections. I use it myself.
I don't understand, does not the title 'The Most Comprehensive Minute By Minute Timeline On 911' say what the link goes to and if it's worth while should somebody be interested in that subject to either look at it or not?
i could cut and past the whole thing.
Most of my posts contain a description of what the link goes to is about.
Like a documentry, so i say what the documentry is about, and link to the documentry.
It's what i've done on other platforms for years, which is basically make a source/library of links to documntries all over the place.
I thought that hive was a good option for this, maybe i'm wrong, and should leave hive, and concentrate elsewhere?
My intention was to create a group over here that is currently elsewhere as people have problems over there, seems they will have problems here also.
It is a group, and nobody needs to be in the group if they don't wish to. Maybe i make it private? i'm happy to do that.
I've removed description and stuff about hive from my website, hope that helps a little. As most people i know pretty much do what i do.
I am sorry but I do not understand which group you are referring to, and what "private" means.
Please decline rewards on microblogging content or use one of the options that I recommended.
Thanks.
i've always declined rewards, i find it a setting in peakd, where i decline rewards, i'm not trying to get rewards, and for groups you call them communities, my posts are in the community i made.
and for private, i'm asking if i made the community private does that help?
I was not aware of all these rules and regulations, exactly what are they and where are they?
OK, if you set the rewards to be declined, then you should not have problems with downvotes from anyone.
Of course, i point to documentries, as the description of the community says, it's the makers of those documentries that should be rewarded not me, i'm only linking to them.
As i do on telegram, nostr, bastyon so far with no problem, (years!) only problems been hive.
Do you think i should change the description of the community to add a condition that people must also adhere to the the regulations/format that i've not followed. If so, what are they? so i can add to the description of the community, that you have and i don't. Could i have them or a link to where they are so i can follow them.
Thanks.
ps this is the hive community i made, where the post you are commenting on was posted:-
https://peakd.com/c/hive-192018
You can make your own rules in the community, but it would be rather advisable if the also declined rewards on microblogging content or on sourced copied and pasted conten.
I don't understand, so you saying that members must be told to decline any reward? and what if they don't?