I am referring to the scientific consensus that can be verified by the positions of the world renowned Universities regarding this pandemic.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I am referring to the scientific consensus that can be verified by the positions of the world renowned Universities regarding this pandemic.
Well, the Nobel Peace Prize is World Renowned and they awarded Adolf Hitler during his time, and the US Press was on his side too.
Posted via D.Buzz
I never saw the scientific consensus supporting Hitler or any political party, all I have ever seen is scientists having their particular political positions. Again, science is not an opinion, science is the scientific consensus obtained through the scientific method.
Umm science is NOT a consensus.
It is called the Scientific Method, and not all scientists agree on #Covid19 but you seem to trust the side of the US Government, #BigTech & Universities and w/out skepticism
Posted via D.Buzz
The consensus is obtained through the method. If you cannot refute the consensus using the method, the consensus keeps valid as a scientific truth.
It has been refuted already, but the people who refute it:
Did you know:
Posted via D.Buzz
The consensus refutation must pass through the method, be pair reviewed by scientists of the same area, be published in scientific periodicals etc. A mere anedoctic evidence is not sufficient.
Umm, its public info that the virus hasn't been isolated yet (if ever)
Posted via D.Buzz