Sort:  

Ummm, that "scientific study" doesn't break it down based on age.

Almost all of the deaths are in the 80 years old+ bracket, and accounts for most of the deaths

Look for a scientific study that breaks it down by age, and you'll see the risk for people in their 20's/30's

Posted via D.Buzz

Regardless of age, considering only the number of deaths, it is 3 times deadlier than common flu, by far.

Whatever you say, but it does not justify destroying small and medium businesses worldwide, and handing it on a silver platter to #BigTech, #BigBusiness and in some cases, Governments.

  • If the risk of dying from #Covid19 is 0.03% for ages 20 - 30

They should be free to go out.

Posted via D.Buzz

All I am saying is that this disease is desperately deadly, and I advice people to do social distancing and stay home as much as they can to save lives. At no moment I said that all governments around the world are well intentioned.

But the majority is, that is for sure. And we are in the middle of a war that have already killed millions. And in the middle of wars you have to close businesses too.

Ummm, the war I am seeing is not mankind against a virus, but Governments against their citizens . .

( some of which who do their Government's bidding, not realizing it's against society at large )

  • Again, if the death rate of #Covid19 for ages 20/30's is 0.03%.

    Posted via D.Buzz

The war I see has already 2 million deaths around the world.

Deaths that were calcuated by anyone who died within 28 days of testing positive on a Covid-19 test.

If you don't believe me, check UK's official methodology for determining Covid deaths.

You yourself said it was stupid, but don't know its what they actually use.

Posted via D.Buzz

You would be better of starting a war against car accidents using your methodology:



Posted via D.Buzz