Talking about AI replacing musicians...

in Musicyesterday

Testo del paragrafo.png

News broke recently that Warner Music has reached an agreement with Suno to regulate the production of music "made in AI". Under this agreement, the artists on whom the platform's music is based will be compensated for the use of their work as a template, according to a specific copyright agreement to be established between Warner and Suno.

Seems like the new model will be able to recognize in which percentage an AI track is based from existing copyrighted music and establishes the correct distribution of royalties.

Furthermore, with the new model due out in 2026, Suno will no longer allow free users to download tracks, only sharing. Downloading the generated tracks requires a subscription fee, which also limits the number of downloadable tracks.

Mikey Shulman, CEO, Suno said: “Our partnership with Warner Music unlocks a bigger, richer Suno experience for music lovers, and accelerates our mission to change the place of music in the world by making it more valuable to billions of people. Together, we can enhance how music is made, consumed, experienced and shared. This means we’ll be rolling out new, more robust features for creation, opportunities to collaborate and interact with some of the most talented musicians in the world, all while continuing to build the biggest music ecosystem possible.”

Let me translate this to you.

SUNO: "We are not making enough money from AI generated music. Users subscription are not actually making us a real profit. So we are creating a new model that forces people to subscribe and pay a higher fee under the promise that their money are going to pay the real artists our AI-generated music is based out of. But we are a tech company. We don't give a fuck about art and artists. We just want your money, and we are going to get them, one way or another.🤑"

WARNER: "Agree. Also, once we train Suno algorithm on our own artists music, we'll be able to make our own AI artists, which we don't have to pay because they're not humans. We'll flood streaming platforms with this shit I don't even care to listen because it's dumb. And all the royalties we get from subscribers fees, both on Suno and streaming platforms, will go directly into our pockets. Amazing! No more stupid artsy people to deal with!🤑"

Here's the full article: https://www.wmg.com/news/warner-music-group-and-suno-forge-groundbreaking-partnership

And here's a recent rant on AI music from mister "internet busiest music nerd" Anthony Fantano:

Tell me something different from #fuckAI in the comments, thanks.


If you're curious about who I am and what I do you can visit my website harbiter.com or my Instagram.

Check my music NFTs collection on NFT Showroom

Sort:  
 19 hours ago  

In a world where “human beings” matter less and less, this comes as no surprise, because we are also becoming less critical of the amount of waste we consume every day. You did a good job translating!😄

It's just sad to see how all this new technology developed everyday feels more like a guillotine slowly coming down to our heads instead of something actually helping humanity. It will start cutting our neck inch by inch and we'll slowly kill ourselves like that frog in boiling water

I don't much get people being excited about AI "art" - it's among the creepiest things this endlessly-surprising century has brought us, not to mention most dangerous. A world in which art-making is taken from the humans is not a world I'd like to live in.

This post received a free 7% upvote from Hive Booster. Visit https://hivebooster.xyz to receive a free upvote for your post!

And unlike with writing, and visual media, the vast majority are not sophisticated enough musically to tell the difference.

Go to concerts, I say. Go see live shows. A robot won't be on stage playing a guitar or mournfully making eye contact with a person in the audience as performer and fan sing their hearts out.