Reading the title didn't change anything for me, or should I say I didn't see why AI was thrown in and decided to ignore it. Does this make sense?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Reading the title didn't change anything for me, or should I say I didn't see why AI was thrown in and decided to ignore it. Does this make sense?
Yes, it makes sense. If the work doesn’t suggest AI on its own, the title won’t make it true, so ignoring it is fair. Did any detail later hint at AI like uncanny repeats or odd blends, or did both pieces feel purely handmade in spirit?