I'm in two minds about this. I appreciate the sentiment, and lived in it for a long time. Currently I'm in more of a 'Don't hate the player, hate the game' head-space.
If the system can be exploited there's an argument for actively exploiting it until the exploit is fixed. Part of my 'Unenforceable rules confer a competitive advantage on the disobedient' arc.
Nothing wrong with this - downvotes are part of the system to fix what a stakeholder sees as abusive.