Sort:  

to a point someone with more stake doesn't agree with you.

Not really, they can disagree but they can't control how I vote.

Someone could write a bot and use the free 25% to counter all your votes. Nobody does but the technical, easiest thing to do.

I see all of this as potential attack vectors. The user experience for new users is really bad ( RC delegations should happen more, but i dont do it too, so i cant say a lot about).

A new user can write 3 comments or whatever and then runs out of RC. Most of us have way to much anyway. Something worth to think about.

And imagine someone makes a bot that downvotes all new users. Besides the limit, they have that would be a huge problem in user experience. Since it's a decentralized system, it is what it is.

Is not like they have a right for rewards, that's right. But there is a reason social media platforms remove dislikes on scale.

Someone could write a bot and use the free 25% to counter all your votes. Nobody does but the technical, easiest thing to do.

And imagine someone makes a bot that downvotes all new users. Besides the limit, they have that would be a huge problem in user experience. Since it's a decentralized system, it is what it is.

Is not like they have a right for rewards, that's right. But there is a reason social media platforms remove dislikes on scale.

I talked about this already, months ago in one of my posts.

https://peakd.com/hive-196233/@mrtats/on-downvotes-stake-and-power

i give it a read.

And dont think if i talk about those things, i dont like Hive. I only think ( since I am retarded) what if those things would be improved :D

It could be such a cool place. No politics, just maximum user experience.

I think hive needs a way to value users besides make them net buyers. Not a easy task for sure, this could change the game we play

i give it a read.

And dont think if i talk about those things, i dont like Hive. I only think ( since I am retarded) what if those things would be improved :D

It could be such a cool place. No politics, just maximum user experience.

I think hive needs a way to value users besides make them net buyers. Not a easy task for sure, this could change the game we play

I don't think you hate hive or anything.

In an ideal world, we can just maximize the user experience. But we don't live in a ideal world, and everything has a drawback to it. And once one wants something one ignores or disregard such drawbacks.

In an ideal world we wouldn't have downvotes, because in an ideal world there wouldn't be people trying to game the reward pool through whatever means.

And that is the problem we have, I love people but I also hate people. People make things that I cherish, but they also work to ruin what I cherish.

yeah 100%.

@ausbitclank what do you think about auto-delegating some RC ( 0 cost) to new users run out of RC, you can check before if they are spam Users or abuse users.

The user experience would increase and stakeholders could delegate some to you to manage it. Do you think this adds value? I think tbh and i also think a AI can do it better as any human.

@mrtats.cold Imagine we could delegate to Ai agents, improving user experience.

It seems for I was on my cold account.

@mrtats.cold Imagine we could delegate to Ai agents, improving user experience.

I am not against the AI agents themselves, or what they can do on the chain. I am mostly against them getting rewards through post/comments.

People can delegate to them, they can curate, they can receive tips on their posts. There is more ways to monetize them rather than with post rewards.

And they will only get better and cheaper.