You may also include @stemsocial as a beneficiary of the rewards of this post to get a stronger support.
Why?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You may also include @stemsocial as a beneficiary of the rewards of this post to get a stronger support.
Why?
This is in fact something that has always been like this for two reasons, and I was not even thinking about it until you raised it. This has been implemented at a time at which we were trying to grow the community account, and also to have the community members feeling more as parts of our community, and willing to contribute to it in one way or the other. We thus decided to have this little incentive. Note that by "stronger support", we actually increase the voting strength by 1% to 5% so that it has almost zero impact beyond the psychological one.
However, I agree with you that the "to get a stronger support" is a bad phrasing and we should highlight more the "be part of our community" and not mention any support at all. I will think (with our curators) about a good way to phrase this and update the voting script accordingly.