https://unsplash.com/photos/yZygONrUBe8
Greetings, logical thinkers: How is progress thus far being received? I'm going to now give an illustration of what the temperature is like outside the space for those of us who still don't have a good grasp on this idea.
Is it even possible to get as cold as absolute zero in space? If this is the case, what will happen to you if you are not wearing a spacesuit when you enter space?
There is not a significant amount of cold in space, contrary to what a lot of science fiction movies would have you believe. There is no temperature that can even be discussed at this point.
Temperature is a measurement of how quickly the particles that make up an object are moving, whereas heat is the energy that is contained in those particles. There would be no particles or radiation in a region of space that was totally empty, and as a result, there would be no temperature.
Naturally, heat and a temperature are produced in space as a result of the interaction of particles and radiation. How frigid is space, just where does the temperature reach zero degrees, and are there any places in the universe that are completely devoid of life?
SPACE WARMING: THE STARS RESPONSIBLE
https://unsplash.com/photos/E0AHdsENmDg
There are conditions that are perfect for the first stages of nuclear fusion to take place in the hot regions of space that are directly adjacent to stars.
When stellar radiation strikes a region of space that is heavily populated, the temperature experiences a significant spike. In other words, this provides a target for the radiation that stars like the sun radiate into the surrounding space.
This is the reason why our planet, which is so far away from the sun, has such a comfortable temperature, and it is also the reason why humans call it home. When the particles that make up our atmosphere collide, they convert the solar energy that they have absorbed into heat. This conversion takes place because the particles are vibrating after absorbing solar energy.
Even though there are particles there and we are close to our star, this does not necessarily mean that the temperature will be high. Mercury is the planet that is located closest to the sun; as a result, the daytime temperatures on Mercury are extremely high, whilst the nighttime temperatures on Mercury are quite low. The absolute minimum temperature that it can achieve is 95 Kelvin, which is equivalent to -288 degrees Fahrenheit or -178 degrees Celsius.
The surface temperature of Uranus is an extremely frigid -371 degrees Fahrenheit (-224 degrees Celsius), which is colder than the surface temperature of Neptune, which is the next-to-last planet from the sun and has a temperature of -353 degrees Fahrenheit but is still fairly cold (-214 0C).
Uranus is unable to keep its internal heat because of the extreme tilt at which it circles the sun. This extreme tilt is the result of an early collision with a body roughly the size of Earth. As a result of this collision, Uranus orbits the sun at an extremely oblique angle.
Radiation is the single form of heat transfer that isn't very efficient, and the large dispersion of particles in space makes the only other method of heat transfer quite inefficient as well. In scientific parlance, this region is referred to as the "interstellar medium."
In the region between stars known as the interstellar medium, molecular gas clouds can reach temperatures as high as 100 K (-279 °F/-173 °C), while the clouds that are coldest and densest can reach temperatures as low as 10 K (-505 °F/-263 °C).
The term "cosmic background radiation" is often used, but what exactly does that term refer to?
It should be difficult to assign a single temperature to space since the universe is so vast and packed with so many unique entities, some of which have temperatures that are incomprehensibly high and others that have temperatures that are incomprehensibly low.
Despite this, there is something in the entire cosmos that maintains the same temperature to an accuracy of one part in 100,000. In point of fact, the difference is so negligible that 0.000018 degrees Celsius is all that can be said to differentiate a warm region from a cold one.
The temperature of this backdrop, known as the cosmic microwave background (CMB), remains constant at 2.7 K, which is equivalent to -450 degrees Fahrenheit or -2700 degrees Celsius. Since 0 Kelvin is equivalent to absolute zero, this temperature is only 2.72 degrees Fahrenheit higher than 0 Kelvin.
The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is a piece of history that survived the "last scattering," which occurred just 400,000 years after the Big Bang. This event occurred just after the Big Bang. When electrons and protons combined to form hydrogen atoms, that was the moment when the universe stopped having a foggy appearance. After this point, electrons no longer repeatedly scattered light, and photons were no longer restricted in their movement across the cosmos.
Therefore, this fossil relic that has been "locked-in" to the universe demonstrates the very last moment that the temperatures of photons and matter were identical to one another.
It wasn't always the case that the photons that make up the cosmic microwave background (CMB) have such low energy levels. Even though it took these photons around 13.8 billion years to travel to us, the expanding universe has resulted in a decrease in the amount of energy that they possess.
The radiation that eventually became the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is thought by scientists to have begun its existence at a temperature of approximately 3,000 K (5,000° F/2,7260C). This indicates that it originated from a period of time when the universe was significantly hotter and denser than it is at the present time.
The current temperature of space is the coldest it has ever been, and it will continue to get colder for as long as the cosmos continues to expand at an ever-faster rate.
EXPOSURE TO SPACE: WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN?
https://unsplash.com/photos/XD9um8EiEww
The near-vacuum of space would not force an astronaut to freeze to death, contrary to popular science fiction's depiction of what would happen in such a situation.
Heat can be transferred by direct touch, through fluids, and through the air, or by conduction, convection, and radiation, respectively.
Because there is no matter in space, heat cannot travel through conduction or convection. The only way for heat to travel in space is through radiation, and even then, only very slowly. What this indicates is that heat does not travel very quickly through space.
Because freezing needs the transfer of heat, an astronaut who lost heat exclusively by radiation would perish from decompression sickness brought on by the absence of atmosphere considerably more quickly than they would freeze to death.
References
“Eta Carinae.” NASA, www.nasa.gov, https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/images/eta-carinae.html. Accessed 13 July 2022.
“WMAP CMB Fluctuations.” WMAP CMB Fluctuations, wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov, https://wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_cosmo_fluct.html#:~:text=The%20actual%20temperature%20of%20the%20cosmic%20microwave%20background%20is%202.725%20Kelvin. Accessed 13 July 2022.
Lea, Robert, and @SPACEdotcom. “How Cold Is Space? Physics behind the Universe’s Temperature | Space.” Space.Com, www.space.com, 6 July 2022, https://www.space.com/how-cold-is-space.
SITNFlash. “The Human Body in Space: Distinguishing Fact from Fiction - Science in the News.” Science in the News, sitn.hms.harvard.edu, 31 July 2013, https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2013/space-human-body/#:~:text=Acute%20exposure%20to%20the%20vacuum,by%20definition%20has%20no%20mass.
Sutter, Paul M. “You Will Not Freeze To Death In Space.” Forbes, www.forbes.com, 5 Apr. 2019, https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulmsutter/2019/04/05/you-will-not-freeze-to-death-in-space/?sh=6a2eb03e6523.
“Temperature of Space: What Is the Temperature in Space?” Science ABC, www.scienceabc.com, 6 Jan. 2016, https://www.scienceabc.com/nature/universe/what-is-the-temperature-of-space.html.
Fascinating stuff.
I am extremely grateful that you took the time to visit. And, pleased you read that too☺️
It is a logical thing but we don't thing a lot! Good job! here on earth we feel the heat only after the sun light reflects into the molecules in here. If there isn't anything so no heat
!1UP
Click this banner to join "The Cartel" discord server to know more.
Yes, you have the point. Here on earth, we can observe three mode of heat transfer due to carriers which enables such processes but outside the space, radiation is the only means of heat transfer which is quite slow to accomplish.
Thank you for stopping by!!
You have received a 1UP from @gwajnberg!
@stem-curator, @vyb-curator, @pob-curator, @neoxag-curator
And they will bring !PIZZA 🍕.
Learn more about our delegation service to earn daily rewards. Join the Cartel on Discord.
Thanks for your contribution to the STEMsocial community. Feel free to join us on discord to get to know the rest of us!
Please consider delegating to the @stemsocial account (85% of the curation rewards are returned).
You may also include @stemsocial as a beneficiary of the rewards of this post to get a stronger support.
Thanks for this nice blog. I must however react to one of the paragraphs you wrote, and with which I strongly disagree.
In fact, those differences are not negligible at all. We can measure them and use them to get insight on how the universe was 380,000 years after the Big Bang. This gives powerful constraints on many particle physics extensions of the Standard Model.
Therefore, whereas the relative temperature differences in the cosmic microwave background are small, this is not a good reason to claim that they are negligible.
Thank dear @lemouth for pointing that out. Well, the thing is that I am currently undergoing a study on this topic. So I will keep improving as time goes on
Sure! Take your time and don't hesitate to tag me to ask questions. The cosmic microwave background is something I know quite well :)