You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Visual Ergonomics (Work More Safely and Efficiently)

in StemSocial4 years ago (edited)

Hi. The user is plagiarist recidivist that refuses to stop.
Previously caught here (edited post to cover up). Check up Steemcleaners comment under the post:
https://hive.blog/promo-steem/@bettervision/network
Edit can be seen here:
http://scribe.hivekings.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhive.blog%2Fhive-196387%2F%40bettervision%2Fvisual-ergonomics-work-more-safely-and-efficiently

This above post is plagiarised from:
https://www.si.mahidol.ac.th/simi/hci/monitor-ergonomics.htm

Sort:  

@logic Thanks for the notice. I always look for a comment by @hivewatchers to see if there is plagiarism, but seems like the comment came late this time.

@bettervision Could you comment regarding plagiarism?

Indeed, as already mentioned we are a group and different individual presents their writeups for posting, i vehemently believe this was plagiarized and i have accosted him accordingly, if you would have time go through our post you would notice that this is something new and what we do as a charitable organization is not fraudulent. We have lots of people who have benefited from our work and we have lots of steemians here who have seen the group work first hand. So this is an issue that is seriously been dealt with. Thanks for you time though, we are grateful for you reading. Always

Thanks for the response, I hope the plagiarism gets sorted and I'd be keen to read original content from you guys. :)

It is been resolve, unfortunately the response is not coming, maybe the account has to be taken down, not sure what is really happening though

@logic, i believe this was an issue of quotes not well referenced and not as you making it seem to be. Yes the article may not have been well referenced but is not the same as the issue you are pointing to please.

The article ie evident plagiarism. Vast majority of is plainly rewritten by changing the structure of sentences a little bit.

Yes that is true, but the old reference you made was quotes and not an article, thank you