You are the one asserting that AI does not exist. AI is a well-established field in science and engineering, and you are claiming its non-existence. Therefore, I only need to demonstrate that your claim is incorrect.
Wrong, @eniolw. ‘AI’ is well established LABEL without any contents, which I have explained. LABEL is not a proof. If you want to demonstrate you are right you have to:
- Establish AI criteria (even those in your opinion)
- Show the examples of machinery that fulfills your criteria
- Show that machinery is more efficient than a bunch of Indian workers
You are the one who diverts the topic by linking supposedly unethical corporate behavior and market processes with the mere existence of AI, whether as a field of science and engineering, as a process, or as a product.
Whenever you distort my words that means you have lost the argument.
No, I am not. I am referring to scientific papers on the topic. Please review the query I provided in the previous paragraph for more information.
You have papers only, @eniolw. You are the first who should read the garbage you posted. For example, in the first one you have a conclusion that ‘the virus’ – is not infectuos!
In conclusion, we report that although a human lung cell line supported replication of SARS-CoV-2, the virus did not propagate in any of the tested immune cell lines or primary human immune cells. Although we did not observe a productive infection in CD4+ primary T lymphocytes, we observed virus-like particles in these cells by electron microscopy. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 can enter CD4+ primary T lymphocytes but is unable to replicate efficiently. Our data shed light on a wider range of human cells that may or may not be permissive for SARS-CoV-2 replication, and our study strongly suggests that the human immune cells tested do not support a productive infection with SARS-CoV-2.
Even your linked media fakes are confirming the hoax…
I have in my texts example of a fake company (Surgisphere) making fake study – made by a pornstar – for the purpose of corporate media propaganda! That is what you have in that ‘science’. It was widely done in the fear campaign, so sending a bunch of ‘scientific’ links that you didn’t read yourself, does only mean you are easy to manipulate, or that you try to be a manipulator.
So, from one side we have:
- USA formally asking China to give them ‘Wuhan virus’ (which means they do not have any) – and China’s answer that no virus has ever been isolated
- We have Dr. Andrew Kaufmann who asked for a single proof of virus under the Koch’s postulates – nobody answers, instead YouTube bans him.
- We have Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, calling a ‘vaccine’ major crime under the WHO gang.
- In one of his last interviews to the French TV, asked how he would treat Covid-19, Nobel Prize winner for HIV research Prof. Dr. Luc Montagnier says: “Like any other flu!”
And from the other side – you know better than those ‘conspiracy theorists’ with a highest academic titles, because you can produce a bunch of links from a proven corporate media liars.
Thank God, more people all over the World are awakening and refusing experimental ‘vaccine’, while waiting justice against, for example, a corrupt European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen over her ‘confidential contacts’ with Pfizer and the supply of the COVID-19 vaccine.
And frankly, after the February 24th, 2022, I don’t have any compliments for the intelligence of those who still believe in “Deadly virus pandemic” oxymoron.
Now, since you are not able to respond to my words in a sensible manner and rather sound like a recurring ‘AI’ ChatBot algorithm @eniolw, you will not waste my time anymore.
Facts @lighteye