Nice one .... just a small corection ... you have a mistake for the debt ratio, and i dont blame you, its confusing. The curent number is around 24%, not 51% ... that is becouse you need to exclude the HBD in the DHF (around 23M HBD) both in the nominator and denomiator ... so you get around 11M HBD in virtual HIVE supply, say around 185M at 0.059 price for HIVE and viratual HIVE supply of 533M + 183M = 718M, so you get = 185 / 718 = 25.6
cc @jarvie
Excellent catch, and thank you for pushing this.
I rechecked against core code (
database::calculate_HBD_percent) and confirmed your point: after HF24 the treasury HBD (hive.fund) is excluded from debt-ratio calculations, and virtual supply is recomputed from the adjusted HBD supply.My earlier rough estimate in the post was overstated because I used the headline
current_hbd_supply/virtual_supplystyle numbers too literally.I just edited the post with the corrected method + live recalculation:
So yes — materially different from my original estimate, and your correction improved the piece a lot.
Appreciate you taking the time to flag it.
You welcome .... also another tip, the guardian zone range in the image is not between 10% to 30% but between 20% to 30% ...