Well what it actually does is lock people, especially new ones, out of the posting rewards pool.
Worst thing: when I downvoted your shit, you went straight to my blog to downvote me. Fuck you.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Well what it actually does is lock people, especially new ones, out of the posting rewards pool.
Worst thing: when I downvoted your shit, you went straight to my blog to downvote me. Fuck you.
Mind your language. I never insulted you.
You think my post is shit but I can’t think yours is? If memory serves, I downvoted the one that was a simple photo with couple of sentences, talk about reward farming…
Fair Enough. Can't really disagree, but for context: I had not posted for months until one day I had enough and decided to use the autovotes I get to support others. I haven't done the math, but I think I am donating all of my posting rewards from 2021 to smaller accounts, who I think deserve more.
I still think you were just revenge-flagging which is another thing that is generally frowned upon, like excessive mentions and automated posts. You get enough rewards one way or the other and should not get away with things others get into trouble for.
About the language: I think actions are more important than words.
I am more insulted by your behavior than I would be about verbal insults.
...but that might just be a cultural misunderstanding.
I'd rather do what's right than mind my language.
Seems like in our way of doing things we think it's right we all did something that isn't totally right...
Revenge-flagging? Yes true, I probably don't react well to insults and threats of flagging all my posts:
Yup that was me. Can't say I am proud of it.
It was you who kept mentioning me and after I told you to please stop, you went ahead and edited the post 8x and kept on mentioning me that way, over and over.
Still think your autopost is aimed at getting witness votes and to get posting rewards, rather than helping people like you claim. I still think it's the wrong way to go about it. And more than you doing it, it annoys me how people fall for it.
I still think my quote from idiocracy (2006) was on point and hilarious when you came up with 'data is just data'.
I since have found better ways to deal with it, though.
oh did I? I do remember editing some of those posts because they contained mistakes to be corrected, I don't remember having done this to retaliate against you. If I did so then now thinking back, I should not have and accept my apology.
"data is just data", I really didn't want to waste time like I'm doing now trying to justify myself to you. By that I also mean I was just displaying data as a matter of transparency, no personal attacks on any of the witnesses mentioned in the report. You took it as a bad thing because you didn't like being among a list of bad actors which I can understand but my purpose wasn't to give you a bad name but just to educate people with regularly review their witness votes.
I don't think this is a waste of time.
If you are not informed about established posting etiquette, which is important for weaker accounts, you shouldn't be that high up as witness, or at least not compete for posting rewards.
I was under the impression you mentioned me repeatedly just to be a dick about it.
Glad we talked about it.
No need to apologize to me, though. I need to work on my communication strategies. Perhaps I should apologize.
If this talks helped clarify things then it’s probably not a waste indeed.
I do believe that if we both want the best for the platform then we should work together not fighting each other.
It’s OK if you don’t think I’m worth getting up there (which only happened recently). Some big people do think so apparently and if one day they change their mind, I’ll drop out fast.
Anyway, it’s night time here and I have stuffs to finish before bed time.
Again, welcome back witnessing and good luck.