You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Moving beyond coin voting governance - My Thoughts

in #hive3 years ago

I love the focus on the cr. I would be interested in your opinion on how to restrict abuse in a CrChain. How can you limit network bullying, or acts of violence, sexual harrastments, abuse? Who draws the line and where? How do you cooperate with regulators (when they have good intentions)? These are majour issues that disturb big investors when they come to evaluate Hive.

Sort:  

Communities and front ends can decide whose content they want to show, etc. If you act a fool you can be banished from community front ends.

That doesnt solve the legal issues. If someone gets offended and request by law to remove content who should be accountable?
DAO and Cr should also automate or at least publish their procedure to interact with regulators. This is not a trivial matter.

The frontends that display it. You can't sue the blockchain. Hive stores text, so it does not have the issue of dealing with illegal video/image content. Hive already host whistleblower, and all sorts of text people don't want on it. Front ends choose not to display it, but you can still find it on some front ends. For video/image on SPK, it comes down to the miners. If the miners choose to host illegal content, they can go to jail if caught. It always comes down to personal responsibility and the attack vectors, which are the people who choose to display the illegal content.