Hm but doesn't it make large Hive holders less active on the platform? What if the lazy ones who are curating manually think "Why
spend so much of time and manually vote for just 2%?" .
Can't we think of new voting % . Say I have 100% and I haven't voted in 3 days . When I came back to vote , it shouldn't take away 2% per vote but should take less depending on how much time is spent at 100% .
That way , I can vote more number of times per day so the time wasted actually isn't a waste ?
We can cap the maximum number of days maybe so that person who is inactive for 1000 days won't get the benefit of just 0.0001% less VP per vote .
Quality of quantity. I rather have 10 good curators over a 1000 bad ones. We need people who want to curate, not forcing people to curate just to not get their stake diluted. That is a fine game to play but not on the main layer, we must give investors an opt out option, imo.
Why not better just let anyone not willing to actually work to earn new tokens, that they indeed have to see their stake diluted?