I'm waiting to see the numbers on how many people now stay below 80% vote mana.
It was a lot harder to access the last 50% of one's hp.
It's the same over all, on an ongoing basis, but if the account doesn't get back above 50%, then it's a net loss to the restivus.
I can't pull those numbers, yet, but they will be there when somebody does.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
What concerns me too is that non decaying voting could potentially push emissions upward. Not necessarily harmful but something that deserves clarity, especially for us hoping it would translate into price impact.
We were just given quick access to 50% more hp.
That can only result in smaller slices of the pie for the restivus.
It may not play out that way, but watch, when the rugpull comes, you can bet that 50% of the hp will have been drained to zero by the accounts in the know.
Ok, got it.
If it means more efficient use of existing HP then it’s mostly a distribution issue, not more tokens emitted that could impact price.
Maybe it doesn't impact price, but if it impacts distribution negatively, that is negative, imo.
IF the greedy pull out 50% more, albeit only once, why would anybody not just here for what they can extract support that?
I've had to lower my votes in order to not eat up more mana.
Before the fork, I rarely hit 80%, and now I can barely stay above it.
My voting patterns haven't changed, so what gives?