Just what it says, the value transfer space has an owner.
It is not looking for others to compete with them.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Just what it says, the value transfer space has an owner.
It is not looking for others to compete with them.
But what exactly? Like sucking value off hive? What methods?
You've been here long enough to know what our issues with retention are/have been.
Why do you figure the offer has always been like it, lump it, or provide exit liquidity to people reaping the inflation as hard as they can?
I think he's asking the literal function of how it works. He wasn't very active his first 3 years here at all. I don't think he's trolling or being sarcastic.
I remember him joining some contests years back and think he was MIA until a few months back.
What wasn't clear in what I said?
Value transfer is a banking function.
Banks tolerate no competition.
Ergo, they will spend tremendous amounts on whatever it takes to stop anybody from transferring value outside of their approved middlemen.
Their cheapest route is to nip things in the bud.
Paying a killer is cheaper than most ways to stop things dead in their tracks.
Threatening with killers is even cheaper.
Have you even read War is a Racket?
What I am illustrating to you is not even new, wasn't back then, either.
But, why kill a cash cow, when you can more profitably bleed it to death?
@thefed
I don’t know why you can’t just explain it. No I do not understand. Sorry for asking guy.