Thank you for the post.
I do not think it is time to start working on changes to the reward voting system yet. I am still of the opinion we need to let the current reward voting system run for at least a year, and that the priority should still be the fixing of the witness selection retention system.
That I feel should be the number one priority. We still have not fixed or changed the system that lead to the creation of Hive from Steem. I know people keep saying it can't happen again, it can't happen again, over and over. It was something they used to say on Steem also before the takeover.
I feel our priority should be protecting the user base. That includes the casual viewers, the content creators, the investors and the people that like to play the games. The only protection the users have from a system wide one sided change is the ability to have in place witnesses they trust, that they can vote in, and not a system where 3 or 4 people can control who is in the top 21 witnesses.
Just still my thoughts and only representing myself.
I am not sure of all the nuances here. But I agree. Protecting the platform should probably be a high priority. It seems like so many people are "shell shocked" from March Madness. So it makes sense to try to prevent that from ever happening again.
protecting the platform has been done with delayed voting in the last hard fork :)
The current system has actually been running for more than a year (hf22 was the 29th august 2019) so I think it's high time that we tweak things
Yet it still allowed a semi hostile takeover. The 30 days will still allow a hostile take over type thing. A large account buys in slowly, lets the account build and then after the 30 days starts to put in people they want. All it does is make someone wait 30 days before trying. Justin Sun fiasco ran for more than 30 days.
With out a real and meaningful change to the witness system there is no protection. Just my view