but he payed for what is said in proposal. so if he needs to pay for something with bitcoin, moves the HBD to the exchange, he already has 1 btc of personal funds there, so now he has 1.1 BTC. he pays 0.1 BTC for something from the proposal. than he transfers 0.1 BTC to HBD and back to the account and stakes it. Is that ok?
Or here is a personal situation. i went to help and document the WRC event. it was kinda a last minute thing, i didn't even think about should i get payed. now there is a chance that i will get some HBD for 1000km of fuel and tolls i paid with my own money. is it ok if i stake that HBD?
You are comparing the incomparable, your job is done, is known and measurable, you have nothing to explain and you should do whatever you want with the money.
Buddy, we can keep here for days giving examples, or you questioning and I replying but this is more simple than you think. This is just about transparency and things are transparent or not. All conjectures beyond this are things I don't agree with. For me, freedom is the greatest value, next comes transparency.
you got back to the point of this post. how do we measure are the funds asked ok for the job that it is done.
I see you were mentioning SPK. i followed talks of what it is done. but i must say i have no idea how far is it to be finished and even how much it is done. most of it is way beyond my understanding. and that, from my understanding, was the point of this post. are there people that could say there is a need for some more coding and connecting these 4 things together and everything mentioned in the proposal will actually come together or this is miles away and they did nothing.
I understand what you're saying and the purpose of the post, that's all right. I've commented because with more transparency and reporting from all those who receive funds, almost half of the topic of the post is done.