I’m not a hardliner when it comes to KE. If you have a chance, please read what I think about the subject (you can go straight to 👁 KE = Rewards/Stake Coefficient).
I analyze each case individually because I believe there are several factors that can increase the KE. Some analyses are within my own understanding. When they aren’t, I turn to Abacus.IA to obtain all the information needed to make a fair judgment https://peakd.com/hive-139531/@cryptoreforma/my-hive-monitor. Abacus is a platform that aggregates various AI´s.
In your case, I didn’t even need to spend credits/tokens. I went straight to your HIVE-Engine and saw that you’re a major investor in a token (MEDALS). In other words, you maintain value within the HIVE ecosystem. You’ve never been a extractor, and you aren’t a extractor.
All the KE cases shown in the image—with two- and three-digit values—were analyzed. However, I want to point out that I don’t blame users with high KE.
I do, however, blame the curation groups and various stakeholders who are constantly voting for extractors and ignoring users who keep HIVE staked and (still) buy HIVE. (Abacus.Ia also informs me of this.)
Yeah you have a great system . I should think about this more myself