Pay per word highly in favor of short post and by far, not even little... I doubt a 50 words post is worth heaps
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Pay per word highly in favor of short post and by far, not even little... I doubt a 50 words post is worth heaps
Last week, on HIVE:
Payouts:
see the average between 50 and 250 has not that much difference, but the effort behind is very different... i don't look the max as it depends on whos posting/autovotes etc...1000 words earns 4x but the effort is not 4x of 50 words
Who is posting should have no connection to payout.
What they're posting should, in my opinion.
Curators shouldn't tolerate "well-known" people getting big rewards for "small, shitty posts" (my own words there).
The averages are definitely closer to reality, but I struggle to fathom where there's a huge gap on the average and the max. Was someone else's 100 words worth 100x more than the average?
Maybe hive SQL can help here?
Acid observation is correct tough, some accounts should be excluded
I am already using HiveSQL to pull the data :) Many accounts are excluded, just don't have the list handy at the moment. Possibly some more could be excluded. Feel free to look at the names that appear in the post I linked above, and let me know if you feel that any should be excluded in the future :)
We can then compare the excluded accounts to the included accounts and have another data point, lol :D
Maybe I'm blind but I can't find the list of excluded accounts lol
It was in the first post I did on the topic. I will be sitting down to go over the exclusion list tomorrow, I will have a post a few days after that, I've got a few bits and bobs scheduled to go live between now and then on other topics.
Have you looked at what the max reward posts are? Maybe some aren't "content" but stuff like ocdb onboarding/poshtoken comments/burnposts/hbdstabilizer, etc. Just wondering if you've filtered anything out at all
hbd.funder is filtered out. There's a few other accounts excluded from the data, such as waves / snaps / leothreads containers, etc.
I am not at the main computer at the moment, so I do not have the list. I will get that in the next day or two when I am back in that vicinity :)
I mean you gotta consider what kind of posts in terms of tags/communities they are as well. If it's quality photography what does it matter that it's less than 100 words.
I'd be interested in seeing the bulk of content in those split up sections.
I can definitely have a go at carving it up by a single community - eg, photography lovers is one of the biggest ones - and well, images are subjective, but there are underlying measures of quality to photography that can be objective measures - is it compositionally sound, is it in focus, is it exposed correctly, etc...