You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Shakeout in Governance: DHF enters Savings Mode // EDIT: ok not anymore

in #hive8 months ago

And it's a problem of blocktrades for having too much stake? Bullshit. It's the rest problem for having nothing comparatively speaking.

Completely agree. It's not his fault for having a much higher stake by comparison.

My suggestion is, why not distribute this inflation ONLY to HP which is actively involved in governance?

I have thought about that and even wrote about it. Was promptly countered in enough comments, but I don't remember the reason(s) unfortunately. Regarding the proxy part, yes, that activates an inactive stake for governance for a little bit of an incentive, but at the cost of likely growing a few centers of power (it's often been the case when users didn't understand what they are giving up - I've seen and had to explain why someone voting on a proposal counts as 0 even though they had enough HP - we are talking orca level -, because they had their vote proxied and the proxy didn't vote on the proposal they wanted passed; it is for Splinterlands proposal, btw, another one that generated some drama).