That's not even funny. 💩steem💩 adds zero value as a blockchain, same does blurt. The first is centralized and broken beyond repair, the second just forked the first’s code, ripped out downvotes, and calls that "innovation".
I couldn’t give a flying flamingo what their prices are, and actually I’m surprised the market hasn’t taken them to zero by now.
Now you show up asking Hive’s DHF for 90000 HBD so we can join back with 💩steem💩?
That’s like asking the victim to kiss the rapist.
No.
Hive’s metrics already beat those two jokes by far, and yes, retention can improve, but the way to do it is to keep shipping on Hive.
I’m not even going to waste my time complaining on the missing parts of a well made proposal, or how bad some of those ideas are, because the core idea is riddiculous.
"In my 9 years in this ecosystem..."
You should know better, really.
To do that, Azircon's KE ratio is doing good.
And a cherry on top is Livinguktawain's vision of
apis.hiveproject.She motivated alot of people to not delegate more than 30% of their hp to projects. Imagine hive getting more and more decentralised one step at a time. People not dumping their stake and people not handing over all their stake for some benefits. I see them as biggest changes of how I see hive. Instead of getting one lucky ocd upvote, it can be many people with combined vote of exceeding ocd upvote (ocd is example to show decentralised stake only. The point is, if people r holding their stake too, it's valuable as much as curation projects r. We need more manual clicks controlling trending.)
Just wanted to drop my2cents. Everyone knows about KE ratio by Azircon but have u seen Livinguktawain's efforts? (Trying to get your feedback)
I talked to many Brazilians who got interested to keeping 70% of their stake to themselves. People r doing maths to find their 30/70 spit. It's the most wonderful thing I witnessed among recent projects.
Actually I saw her presentation at Hive Creator Days in Graz :-)
Yeah, I'm not a fan of HP delegations, having Hive Power in own hands is cool and adding gamification to that is a good way to go.
The core of it is a multi poster so if and existing user doesn't see value in Blurt or Steem they don't have to connect to those chains.
No one is going to make you play a game of Twister with an arch rival who is posting on the Steem blockchain.
Someone could continue to use HIVE and not know any of this is there. It would be like someone posting on Ecency but not knowing PeakD exist and not knowing about the Hive Engine.
For new people getting onboarded they could very easily never of heard of HIVE, Blurt, or STEEM and it wouldn't be until they get deeper in the weeds they realize what is under the hood.
I think everyone would agree that the pricing for HIVE is sitting on the floor. There are a lot of other long standing projects sitting on the floor as well and we don't really know how much upside there will be.
If we don't onboard new users who are sloshing money around on Solana, SUI, Avalanche .....etc the core of HIVE will continue to become smaller and smaller. The inner circle will become more fractured. Then it becomes who's first out the door. Everyone is eye balling guys powering down and no one new is really showing up to develop here or invest here.
Such massive action needs to be taken from all directions but people are scared to even put in a proposal or even comment on a lot of this. Most that know it doesn't feel right here will quietly go out the back door.