You were asking about Hive core vision. The original point on Twitter was to let community members propose their own visions without being guided. It was meant to be open-ended for that purpose so the Hiveblocks account couldn't respond in any other more detailed way.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I think, before asking others, we should publish the vision of all the great people building for hive - do we have one ?
We don't have a vision statement. We have the technical vision which summarizes what we're building. The vision is to create scalable, enterprise-level technology that is highly modular and versatile, meaning uses plugins and layers as much as possible.
The vision doesn't include how the technology is meant to be used because the ecosystem is supposed to determine that. So if you for example want to use Hive tech to build something that doesn't exist yet, our purpose is to make sure you can do that. We don't specify the desired use-cases. That's the difference between decentralization on Hive and centralization on other blockchain-based products which have a clear use-case in mind.
I don't think, its how business work - you are building a product and you want business to discover how they can use that, instead of you telling them ?
I think, the dapps specify some use-cases ( so we do through them). But this has nothing to do with decentralization vs centralization. Decentralization is more oriented towards the ownership of assets and use cases for usage of decentralization alone would be very specific. However, you will have a lot more other use case of what business can create. Saying vision is to create scalable, enterprise-level technology that is highly modular and versatile is a very vague statement - we should publish some use cases - like when you talk of scalability - we should show some matrix with real data and another matrix which we expect the business to test.
Long topic....
I think we're talking about different things here although in the same spectrum. Would you be interested in taking this to a chat?
Well, I can definitely talk on chat, but I think, our objective is to have our core contributor's opinion, that matters most to the outside world.
This just isn't the right post for it.