Ok no that’s cherry picking what I said.
I have been saying I vote with my opinion and trying to articulate my opinion is nuanced and changing.
But you want to chain me to a metal pole for the things I’ve said?
Ok fine, so in this instance you had no upvote and I downvoted you.
What is it in this case? I’ll tell you. I’m sharing my opinion. And I think you said something in bad faith.
You took me out of context and used it against me.
I think that’s inappropriate.
According to your criteria, what you did was fine. You have more HP than me; you have the power. Would you invest in a network where, if someone with more power than you gets angry, they can cancel your account by downvoting you?
Maybe if I ask in bullets this will be easier:
Who decided what the down button is for? (Please show me the document that validates this.)
Who decided that every post deserves some reward based on how much time someone spent on the post?
(Please show me the document that validates this.)
I think you should consider the purpose of upvotes and downvotes on the red.
But you have more HP than me, so you can delete my account.
I literally have no idea what you are talking about
@sk1920 is this question unreasonable?