So I'm no github expert but... So it would seem you have been waiting for a code review for four months? Is the expectation that you continue to draw funds, or deserve to draw funds during this period? Is there more work that has been going on in the background that perhaps the community could have been updated more about since your github looks pretty dead? Even if the code is there, complete, and ready to be reviewed, should you continue to draw funds from the DHF?
I never said or implied that I havent been doing anything for four months as you have implied here. I am, however, offering and asking for a code review on the Ledger repo to get a step in the right direction and to see if there are even any devs capable of the task.
To determine if my work is overvalued, we should see how many devs can deliver the same type of code that I have, and continue to deliver.
A simple peer review with a write up is all this post asks for. Can no one really provide that? If so, then I would say my skills are very scarce right?
That's why I asked the question after making the statement. The community at large doesn't have insight into your daily activities, however you posted your github as PoW. If you are doing work, that is great. I suspect with some regular updates to the community regarding what you are doing, your funding probably would not have fallen off. I think it will only get harder to fund proposals as hive exits bootstrap phase and the distribution flattens. I don't think it's unreasonable to provide milestones and progress reports for a community-funded proposal. I've seen you post about some exciting prospects for the ecosystem, but that isn't quite enough to build confidence with some community members. If you committed to doing that, I don't think a couple million HP worth of votes would be hard to come by.