The problem is that we can be thousands who agree with you and want change but only one whale can outweight our votes.
By the way why isn't there a negative vote possibility in the DHF like in the posts?
Or why isn't DHF proposals selected based on voter count instead of voter HP?
Again, because this way whales can decide over a large amount of small voters.
We wanted democracy here but we got the same bullshit as in real life, just with different people.
This feature is asked before as well. Currently return proposal acts as negative vote but it's not as strong as a direct downvote.
U can create one new account per week for 5k hp for free. It's not a solution. Account reputation system is also broken.
Can't comment on this statement.
Basically we could have a voting system where there is a yes/no from every voter and the proposal is only funded when X number of votes are present and the majority said yes.
Account fraud is still a problem though as you said big wallets can create many accounts to vote. So how can we counter whale decisions with smaller accounts?
Whales r not magical creatures, buy more hive solves every problem
No it doesn't! And that's classic class thinking. Not everyone can afford it. And if Hive is meant to be truly decentralized, it wouldn't be about who has the most money because that's what's fucked up about the real world too, no??