You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: HiveForum KL Roundtable (Sun 19 OCT 2025): Improving DAO Spending, Accountability & ValuePlan Transparency

in #hiveforumyesterday (edited)

Smaller grants can be managed by single approval from one of the members (suggested was less than 5k USD)

Id disagree with this. It should be 3 reviewers for everything. Even if its 500 dollars. Much simpler to implement and manage. Many proposals are split into smaller amounts and you could technically split even the large VP payments into smaller chunks. So you can probably see how that could create problems. In theory you could split all funding into sub 5000 HBD payments and completely avoid needing the majority 3/3 approval.

From 0-20k should be 3 people signing off.

Change the Value plan to a tiered approval process with a 2 out of 3 or a 3 out of 3 approval process for budgets above 5K USD.

This also could create issues if its 2/3. Should be 3/3.

For the rest of the stuff here... I mean you know my position already. I still think people will vote on the DHF what they want to vote. Its basically about dealing with them on a individual basis. Decentralization comes with voters voting how they want to vote. Different values, different ideas of what Hive is. Whatever it might be.

But I am happy with the VP changes. Simple, easy to do, can lead to wanted results.

Sort:  

End Valueplan completely. Let each spend gain support for a proposal. That will better control the fraud that only Valueplan of all the proposals that Hive has funded so far suffers credible allegations of.

All that approval boards crap is simply more vectors for fraud unaccountable to the Hive community, beyond their ability to control by voting for or against with their stake. You are not the Hive community, and Vibes should stand on it's own (frankly, I bet it would), as should every ask Valueplan unaccountably disburses DHF funds on. Three person Soviets to approve or disapprove spends isn't what Hive is about. Hive is about voting our stake ourselves.

What if 3/3 approval still exists but funds don't go to an account these 3 people control, instead there is an escrow and the 3 people all sign to release payments after they have vetted things? Makes the whole process more transparent, no?