You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: 🔥 Call to action winners of 200 Hive about WINKLEVOSS twins are voicing the end of Facebook era on five or ten years!

in #hiveposh4 years ago

I think all the people complaining about being mentioned should grow up, you are on a public platform in which anybody can mention you and you can mention them, get over it. Hive is an uncensored platform one of the only uncensored content publishing sites on the internet, we work on peer-to-peer verification around here, don't we? About 108 have liked this, and 66 actually downvoted it as of writing this comment. The community has spoken, now we will see if this holds up. He gave away Hive to people but because he mentioned a lot of people he's a bad guy? It's a mention!

Sort:  

People are free to disagree on an uncensored platform as well, and since the overwhelming majority feel tag spam is bad form, that makes it bad form. It was bad form before this incident. It will remain bad form after this incident.

You will notice I never said it was good form

You will notice I didn't either.

So whats your point, I said exactly what you said...

The elephant says canoe and I think I need some cardboard shenanigans this week.

what does that have to do with anything?

Nothing. I just wanted to win the game of nonsense we seem to be playing.

Big accounts who think they are the hiarchy the scorn of this platform

What does that have to do with anything?

As someone who's been using decentralized platforms since steemit, I wish the downvote option would be done away with. I understand why it exists, but it is a very unfair advantage if you're a teeny weeny little fish. I've seen some great bloggers take massive hits even on hive very recently because some whale felt their payouts were just too big for the content. in a way that's a form of censorship since it can actually discourage people from posting. Fortunately it's never happened to me and I personally would never click that button knowing that I have virtually no power here and I could be eaten alive by just one whale. If it were up to me there would be no downvote but there would be a way to block an account if you didn't wish to have interaction or see their content. Just my 2 cents.

Spam vs free speach. Think there are a few behaviours for what downvotes are a good thing. Tagging in thousands is spam, not free speach and should IMHO be flagged down to zero, and on repeat behaviour, below.

What I do think is that we need a checkbox for safe downvoting. Downvoting cuts in reputation as well as earnings. We should have an option for earnings only downvotes I think. Reserve the deep cutting downvotes for repeat offenders.

This kind of shit had people fleeing Steemit in droves we just don't want that kind of stuff happening to hive too

If you read the whole thread you will see I came to tht conclusion as well

Funny. I wasn't giving much thought to the call per se, just curious looking at the comments until I saw yours.

About the opening post, it's mass advertising. Advertising can be well or bad received depending on the audience and it's better to find out what it's gonna be before going for it.

Now... you telling us (me) what I should do... that's unsettling. Especially telling me to grow up. How dare you! I refuse to grow up. So there! :D

well said, but I actually said it is an open platform in which anybody can say anything to anyone, I never said dont do anything, I simply gave my opinion, whereas others in this thread were telling this user not to do something, there is a difference.

Don't tell Trump this.

can I have some hive? I need some to tokenize my art