I am sharing only what i know and what i'm keeping tabs on. these are my own personal opinions. If you know of any platforms that's better than these you are free to share.
Also most likely you failed their verification process so that is in no way my fault. It might be because you don't have a LinkedIn account like what you've said in your last comment.
Also, that ad hominem attack is NOT COOL.
I got a linkedin now. Still not verified. Ad Hominems DO work. Its just a myth that they are fallacies. If you have studies that prove otherwise, please share.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul_Ralph/publication/296698660_Practical_Suggestions_for_Improving_Scholarly_Peer_Review_Quality_and_Reducing_Cycle_Times/links/56d8cba808aebabdb40d2111/Practical-Suggestions-for-Improving-Scholarly-Peer-Review-Quality-and-Reducing-Cycle-Times.pdf
Check out page 560 and page 561. It's a perspective towards how ad hominem attacks can be counterproductive. The area highlighted in the piece above is with regards to the problems with scholarly peer review. Let me know if you have problems opening the link.
In not interested in your abstract philisophies, i care about the real world. Earn.com is a scam. Sola.ai is a scam. Maybe you should worry about real people instead crying about an ad hominem.
@thundercomic is most likely a 12 year old boy still experimenting the values of online decency and web etiquette. No need to take mind of what he says.
Yep, i dont think he's any older than 14.