Assuming an average of 80 beats per minute and you live to be 80 years old, your heart would have beaten approximately about 3.3 billion times. It is a muscular organ about the size of a fist, located just behind and slightly left of the breastbone. Never resting even for a second, this muscular organ provides life-giving oxygen throughout the body.
Researchers from the University of Oxford in the UK have shown that the first contraction of the heart muscle occurs 7.5 days after conception in mice, which they extrapolated to be as early as day 16 in humans.
Sometime ago National Geographic did a great video animation on the anatomy of the heart. Here it is for your watching pleasure:
Copy/pasting different sentences from different articles you find online is plagiarism. Don't be a thief.
https://www.webmd.com/heart/picture-of-the-heart
https://www.sciencealert.com/first-of-our-3-billion-heartbeats-happens-sooner-than-we-thought
@steemflagrewards
In a heartbeat you got a !BEER
!sc ban
Mass plagiarism.
Banned @rahemanali.
Two of my recent posts related to heart and brain respectively were flagged for plagiarism. Here's why I think @steemcleaners assessment was in error.
Heart and brain are keywords that bring up billions of pages on the web. The likelihood of finding matches to any cherry-picked phrases, partial sentences or even sentences related to such an omnipresent topic is extremely high, giving rise to the copy-paste conundrum. But is that enough for proving plagiarism?
To counter the plagiarism allegations, I searched for the top plagiarism detecting algorithms available on the Internet and picked up two of the highest ranked sites to test both the posts for plagiarism. They are https://www.grammarly.com/plagiarism-checker and https://www.duplichecker.com
Used both of these highly credible sites to test both of my blog posts that were subject of accusers' allegations. Instead of submitting the screenshots of the results, I recorded the live screen activity so you can see the entire process while the content is actually processed by the plagiarism algorithms of these sites. Here is the video evidence:
The results speak for themselves. None of these algorithms detected any plagiarism in any of those articles. You have links of these sites and can also check it yourself. If you want to find out what percent of content similarity is acceptable by peer reviewed journals here's the answer.
Hope this is enough evidence to prove that plagiarism allegation against me is not valid. As such, I request you to please remove your downvotes, and I request you to upvote to compensate the other prejudicial downvotes to these posts and two of my other posts that resulted because of your subjective judgment.
The issue also raises another important question: Would you use your subjective judgment when very efficient algorithms are available to check plagiarism objectively and instantly?
Thanks
Congratulations @rahemanali! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPVote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!
Your level lowered and you are now a Red Fish!
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!