I suggest I am different because, rather than assign "true" or "false" to data I receive, I ask, "Does that explain what I see?," and the more it does, the higher the probability of truth I give it, adjusting My probabilities as new data come along that better explain what I see. In this way I do not attach to things being true or false, as Most do. And I have arrived at a very different picture of things than Most for that reason.
My dad taught Me this approach. I wish everyOne could have had My dad as Their father. LOL! I even did a video about it: Never Believe ANYTHING!: https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/never-believe-anything:5