Unfortunately, this argument is not as it appears.
There are three sides to this debate. Freedom, Security and Control.
We all know that giving up freedom for security gives you neither.
Still, those arguing for security are arguing from an emotion. And emotions are not quelled by statistics or facts.
However, the ENTIRE reason that "assault weapons" are even debated is because of the 3rd side in this argument. Those that want control. Control of the entire population. They do not care if the wolves kill the sheep. What they care about is complete control. Gun violence is not a concern, keeping people from opposing the police officer is the concern.
So, since we have three sides, and only talk about two of them, we will never reach an agreement. Further, we have facts fighting emotions. In this case, emotions always win... until they die from being smooshed by facts. Reality is harsh.
Well, my outlook on this definatly has changed over time - not surprising that i wouldve been very opposed to guns as a german.
Yes, they do sometimes stop criminals. And more often than they kill others they are used for suicide - and while id prefer to go out on an OD of heroin, which allegedly doesnt feel much different than a normal trip till you go out which typicly is seen as pleasurable... And its much cleaner than blowing your brains out. But enough of that tangent, i definatly think people having the means to decide over their own body and life is a good thing.