The following statement is incorrect.
"History will show that the United Nations was behind many of the atrocities of the 20th Century (Nazi Germany notwithstanding)- particularly on the continent of Africa."
The United Nations is a front.
Evidence:
- International law is proof of world governance.
- U.C.C The United Commercial Code is proof of world governance.
- One can see the evidence @socioecohistory has provided and clearly see the Cheetah bot is not as advertised. There website: https://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/ has lots of evidence showing who is the driving force behind the United Nations, but you will have to figure it out for yourself so don't just believe me.
Hint: What is the difference between a Zionist and a Jew?
The Rockefellers are the funding mechanism (one of the largest) behind Zionism. They're related to the Rothschilds... in fact that's who gave them their start.
The Rockefeller's are visibly agents on the political and financial side representing the Commercial interest. It is the agents of the sea that we do not actually see that the Rockefeller's are presenting.
The international court... as far as I'm aware they haven't prosecuted anyone of note although they do issue warrants that never seem to get served. They seem for the most part toothless.
I don't know if you've studied Tavistock at all. They're like a web of NGO's, think tanks, etc funded by the Rockefeller, Ford, and other foundations. The way they're set up is too complex to explain here. I wrote a 9 part series and still didn't explain it enough for my satisfaction. They were behind the Beatles, for one thing. Their goal is control society on a global scale
To me Tavistock defines what is meant by De Facto Conspiracy Corporation. While not all conspiracies are bad Tavistock is beyond bad and actually fits what is meant by the word Evil. Meaning anti life. One of the things that social inequality studies show is that control is not good for living beings. Spontaneous order naturally occurs and is good for life. Life reacts violently to artificial control and is why Tavistock works in secret. Their goal may be to control society, but unfortunately the more success they have the more life dies.
The savage is not the living being that lives in the forest, but the one who destroys it.
Beautifully put! Their organizational structure is so convoluted it's impossible to tell "who's in charge." It's councils within councils that spread out through every facet of government and society... I call it the Kudzu effect.
I call it the actions of someone who knows they are guilty of crimes. There is a silver lining to all of this, but unfortunately I am not at the liberty to explain. The best thing people can do is put forth the law. In America that means getting with their local committee of safety and put forth the law. It would help if people got a civilized education at nationallibertyalliance.org they have a fee civics course that shares the vested interest of American society.
Most of the rest of the Western World has some form of common law, and are even now being re-educated as to what and how it works. The Magna Carta is a great start on that.
I'll have a look at their website... as far as common law goes, I always thought we borrowed from the Brits.
I just wanted to note that evidence of something is not proof. The mere fact that international law exists doesn't prove it's anything more than code regulating the interactions of sovereign entities. Certainly international law existed long before there were Rothschilds at all.
I reckon we all can be characterized as unique in our understanding and grasp of facts. As long as we don't set the bar too high, we can work together to resolve our common interests.