If everything about climate science is true(it isn't, its all based on projections with flawed input data) then there wouldn't need to be a "Union of Concerned Scientists" is the first thing I am going to say.
The truth is the truth and is reproduceable. Models that have flawed data inputs isn't truth, anyone can change the inputs and make the output be what they want.
You know what was big during my growing up? The "global ice age that was coming" despite, then it was "Y2K!!!!" then "Global Warming!!!!" now it is "Climate Change".
There are plenty of things I have read that disprove what is going on but it all has to be taken together.
Here is just one simple one https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses
@truthforce writing