Academia only acknowledges things once they are verified beyond any reasonable doubt,
so it tends to lag in true positives and be almost clear of false positives.
Its attitude can be described as preference for false negatives over false positives, but it is not an exact description, because most professors are aware of known unknowns.
Most professors there do not claim that they know the entire truth.
Its job is to discover and verify the truth.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
In my experience, the mainstream academics do indeed claim to know 'the truth' about such things in the earth story - at least enough to make claims publicly as to what our past looks like and to base the teaching of children upon their agreed upon ideas. There have always been doubts about many aspects of our Earth story and yet they continue to be presented to children and adults alike, as facts.
They know the truth, but not entirely.
The example u brought here, if true, is an example of a false negative and not of a false positive so it is not like u showed that they are liars.
If not true, and I am no expert to judge, then it is an example of a good filtering.
What they tell are facts in the most exact manner they know.
You can also discredit quantum mechanics and general relativity for failing to describe reality under certain extreme conditions, but they are still the most exact ways to model reality known to date.
Discredit them completely and ur left with less, and unable to explain many facts.
Do u think there is any agenda or conspiracy or corruption involved?
To state such a claim means that you yourself know the absolute truth already. ;)
Did you watch the video? I think you probably didn't, based on your comment here.
Definition of 'fact':
As evidenced in the video, there are numerous aspects here which totally contradict the alleged facts that academics typically spew out - which can quite easily be shown to demonstrate that either these academics have done no real research, have very low intelligence or are covering up the truth.
Again, you appear to be stating that you have spoken with or understand the learning of every human that ever lived - how else can you make such a statement that includes an absolute statement of fact regarding the limits of human knowledge 'to date'? I can show you numerous sources of information which are not commonly known about which vastly expand on the mainstream perception. Anyone who states that 'we' know this or that, as if they speak on behalf of all humanity, is missing something quite significant in their use of logic.
I know with 100% certainty that there is - however, it is not always done consciously. Many of those involved are just not very deep thinkers and thus never notice that they are helping deny reality. Others know much more and are deliberately hiding the truth.
You got a 19.05% upvote from @sleeplesswhale courtesy of @stimialiti!
You got a 15.87% upvote from @luckyvotes courtesy of @stimialiti!
You got a 10.53% upvote from @steembloggers courtesy of @stimialiti!
You have said it all.
I like ya.
You got upvoted from @adriatik bot! Thank you to you for using our service. We really hope this will hope to promote your quality content!
You got a 33.56% upvote from @luckyvotes courtesy of @stimialiti!
You got a 25.00% upvote from @sleeplesswhale courtesy of @stimialiti!