You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Shouldn't We Be Having A Nuclear Winter?

An aspect of 'nuclear winter' is the simultaneous impact of many inputs into the climate system. Just as a series of volcanic eruptions can contribute over time what would be a single devastating supervolcanic eruption but fail to cause systemic disruption, so nuclear blasts.

Thanks!

Sort:  

I grew up during the "Nuclear Winter" propaganda campaign and ten years later when I found out the amount of bombs that were tested I was shocked, but yes your right this is not the exact scenario laid out in The Day After

But it's not nothing...

"But it's not nothing..."

You're sure right about that.

cancerdeathrates.jpg

Lung cancers doubled every ten years for decades after the tests. There's also been massive propaganda that smoking was the cause.

smokingratechart.gif

Doesn't match the data though.

Still, the deaths from a nuclear winter would have been far worse, so we can be grateful to have dodged that bullet - so far.