"People who have never owned slaves should pay slavery reparations to people who have never been slaves."
This actually fails to fully encapsulate the reality. Today slavery remains legal in the USA under the 13th Amendment. If you disagree, read it. More than 2M slaves are today held captive in the USA and this is considered lawful under the Constitution.
In fact many of those currently enslaved are considered to owe reparations to folks that have never been enslaved by racists who advocate reparations based on skin color.
"...Chinese virus..."
France has revealed that SARS2 infections predate Nov. 2019 in France. Does that make it a French virus? It is pure propaganda to call this a Chinese virus. If you agree, as most reasonable people now do, that this virus is a product of laboratory research, then it is useful to note that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was funded by the US, as many labs around the world are today. Does that make it a US virus?
I don't think so. It's not useful to consider SARS2 as a product of any nation. There is a cabal of banksters that have corrupted essentially all governments international, national, and even local, that better meets the standard of responsibility for this psychological threat (I say psychological rather than medical because the current 'official' CFR is .026%. Not much of a medical threat).
Thanks!
Do the crime do the time - The Thirteenth Amendment (Amendment XIII) to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime.
If the Chinese virus was already here and circulating, what's the purpose in giving the viral strain the "novel" moniker.
Semantics...
~25% of death row convicts that were availed DNA data after their convictions were proved innocent. Most of them accepted a plea bargain. Innocent people are being extorted en masse in America to accept being enslaved. More than 90% of convictions in America are plea bargains. Extortion.
Worse, slavery cannot be lawful, regardless of any attempt to justify it. Not only are ~500,000 innocent people convicted of crimes in America they did not commit, Every state and the federal government commit against all their captives a crime against humanity by declaring a sovereign human being property.
People are born sovereign. Nothing they do can change that, nor can anything another does change that. It is innate to them, an aspect of their being. A sovereign cannot be property. Property cannot own anything, and sovereigns can own property, so cannot be property.
Therefore the act of enslaving another cannot be just, lawful, or tolerable to free society.
If you believe you can be property, you tell me you are not sovereign, and that your opinion has no more merit than my toaster's.
The USA did not abolish slavery, daily afflicts innocent American with it, and commits crimes against humanity every time it does, and every day it afflicts any human person with treatment as property. The fact that this thing called government is an agreement by free people by which to order their society means that no right or authority the free people themselves do not have can be delegated to government.
No one can delegate the right to enslave a human being, because only human beings have rights, and if they have rights they cannot be property, because property cannot have rights. If property delegates it's nonexistent rights to government, no delegation has occurred because no authority existed to delegate. If you claim human beings can be property you claim you do not have rights, and your opinion is without merit, or value of any kind, being a claim of property and not a sovereign person. Property cannot make a claim, because it cannot claim property.
We are sovereign persons, and that cannot be severed from our existence. Any pretense that it can be is false.
Slavery cannot be lawful under any just theory of law. Claims that it is are false, and undertaking it is the most dire capital crime that can exist.
Sovereign persons can commit crimes, as we see, and free society has a right to defend their rights justly. There is a lawful right to prevent sovereign persons that commit crimes from exercising their rights as necessary to defend society.
It does not sever the sovereignty from the criminal. It can't, because rights are an aspect of that person, not property they have.