I stand on Ethical ground - much higher than legal ground. I stand under three Laws - the three Laws of Ethics, which are Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do:
Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
Well, that's the thing. Nothing I support is in the "legal" realm, with its obscure definitions and rules, its legalates ("laws" - nothing in the legal system is a Law) that thwart Ethics far more than serve them and of which the number no One knows, and its privilege for the moneyed Individuals.
What I support is Lawful - as I said, the three Laws of Ethics (true Laws). Common law is founded on these, but without the need for money, with all living richly, commerce becomes a ghost. And other than the three Laws, the rest in common law deals with commerce.
So all We need, if We remove money, are those three Laws. And if We are living richly, what motive is there to break the three Laws?
Why would You defraud someOne? Why would You steal? Why would You hurt or kill Others? Yes, there will be a very small Few who choose unEthical behavior for social reasons - a jealous lover, say, - or just mentally deranged (this condition will diminish radically as truly healthy things emerge, not the sickness-creating things created for profit).
But these issues are small enough now - most crime is for profit today - and will no doubt diminish in a rich society. And We surely can deal with the individual issues quickly and Ethically.
I stand on Ethical ground - much higher than legal ground. I stand under three Laws - the three Laws of Ethics, which are Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do:
Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
It may be very close to "common law..."
I probably need to get the right technical terms in english for further conversation with you
Also im no pro in the different legal circles
Well, that's the thing. Nothing I support is in the "legal" realm, with its obscure definitions and rules, its legalates ("laws" - nothing in the legal system is a Law) that thwart Ethics far more than serve them and of which the number no One knows, and its privilege for the moneyed Individuals.
What I support is Lawful - as I said, the three Laws of Ethics (true Laws). Common law is founded on these, but without the need for money, with all living richly, commerce becomes a ghost. And other than the three Laws, the rest in common law deals with commerce.
So all We need, if We remove money, are those three Laws. And if We are living richly, what motive is there to break the three Laws?
Why would You defraud someOne? Why would You steal? Why would You hurt or kill Others? Yes, there will be a very small Few who choose unEthical behavior for social reasons - a jealous lover, say, - or just mentally deranged (this condition will diminish radically as truly healthy things emerge, not the sickness-creating things created for profit).
But these issues are small enough now - most crime is for profit today - and will no doubt diminish in a rich society. And We surely can deal with the individual issues quickly and Ethically.
Upvoted 👌 (Mana: 35/45) Liquid rewards.