A. Don't remove it, and watch as other freedoms are slowly taken B. Remove capitalism C. Remove freedom
all they have to do is overturn the rulings that currently exist on it anyway
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
A. Don't remove it, and watch as other freedoms are slowly taken B. Remove capitalism C. Remove freedom
all they have to do is overturn the rulings that currently exist on it anyway
OK. So we keep this net neutrality law in place. What other laws should we keep in place?
well any that protect privacy and weapon rights at the very least. So we can fix all rights by removing capitalism later....
Won't the fall of capitalism be brought on by its failure to meet the needs of the people to such an extent that the masses revolt.
What about:
Bring the failure
Let it suck so much everybody gets fed up
We all go hungry for a few days
We all fight back together
Keeping net neutrality is a placating band-aid. Pull it off, let the infection come and take the leg.
Passing laws and enforcing laws is just more control in the long term.
but there is a problem with that. I understand accelerationism, but its not always the right thing to do. If people do not understand what the problem really is, and the lack of freedom stops them from finding out. They might not change anything.
that is a good point, and I do agree net neutrality is important for freedom. My trip is that laws seem necessary. They build on each other. Freedom of speech is useless without protection from murder, Enron and ecoli. The government does an OK to shitty job at this but who else would pay a utility regulator such as the one who are supposed to monitor internet speeds.
you are assuming that a market system would still exist without a government. Capitalism literally can not exist without the government protecting it. So nobody would need to pay a utility regulator, because they wouldn't need to exist.
I am not assuming that at all. We are somewhat in agreement. I don't think the internet could exist without capitalism. If capitalism could not exist without government then the internet could not exist (with any reasonable quality)without government. It would be like setting up the internet at a Rainbow Gathering. Without the internet people would organize like ants to put something together and regulate it and all of the other nouns that people want.