It's silly that under net neutrality people who use a service - let's say cat videos on YouTube - can take bandwidth away from people not watching cat videos, and they don't have to pay for it.
The only model that makes sense is one where the people spending bandwidth watching cat videos shill out the money for said extra bandwidth.
Under net neutrality, George who is 75 year old and uses the internet to pay his bills once a month pays the same as Carl the Cryptogeek who is online 24/7.
This has absolutely nothing to do with net neutrality. It so wrong I don't even know where to start.