Yes, it is interesting, especially because people have plenty of time to flag for disagreement on rewards. There is a delicate balance of how you use your stake -- plus social concerns that are actually extraneous to the essential game theory aspect. I do like the idea of puzzles and transformations posted into the STEEM blockchain. They are preserved for anyone to freely check and potentially solve.
Also, much of it is extraordinarily hypocritical and irrational. For instance where it concerns self-voting. It is similar to the very oversimplified ethical/moral considerations most use to guide them through life. All concepts in this vein are self-delusion, because all simply happens with no meaning/moral implication. However, it is true that there are always consequences.